Reliably
Cases without a Neutral Citation Number
In addition to the case law items included on the main pipinfo topic pages, we've also added Upper Tribunal judgments here that may be of interest, despite not having been given a Neutral Citation Number following changes introduced by the judiciary in April 2025.
- Tribunal was wrong to read the RJ v SSWP ‘real possibility of harm’ test for assessing risk as requiring facts that are analogous to the uncontrolled epilepsy considered in that case
- UA-2025-001456-PIP
- WG v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Tribunal must use its inquisitorial function to explore whether a claimant can carry out PIP activities reliably
- UA-2025-000673-PIP
- JE v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions