Fluctuating conditions
A descriptor can apply if satisfied on over 50 per cent of the days in the required period. There are special rules if more than one descriptor in an Activity applies.
Legislation
The rules relating to fluctuating conditions are in regulations.
Regulation 7 of the main PIP regulations provides that the descriptor which applies to the claimant in relation to each activity is -
- where one descriptor is satisfied on over 50 per cent of the days of the required period, that descriptor;
- where two or more descriptors are each satisfied on over 50 per cent of the days of the required period, the descriptor which scores the higher or highest number of points; and
- where no descriptor is satisfied on over 50 per cent of the days of the required period but two or more descriptors (other than a descriptor which scores 0 points) are satisfied for periods which, when added together, amount to over 50 per cent of the days of the required period - (i) the descriptor which is satisfied for the greater or greatest proportion of days of the required period; or (ii) where both or all descriptors are satisfied for the same proportion, the descriptor which scores the higher or highest number of points.
NB – for the purposes of regulation 7, the "required period" is a period beginning 3 months before, and ending 9 months after, the date of claim or change of circumstances.
Source: Regulation 7 of the Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) Regulations 2013 (SI.No.377/2013), and regulation 7 of SR.No.217/2016 in Northern Ireland.
See also the Personal Independence Payment assessment guide for assessment providers (part 2).
NB - in Scotland, adult disability payment is replacing personal independence payment and the rules relating to fluctuating conditions are found in regulation 10 of the Disability Assistance for Working Age People (Scotland) Regulations 2022 (SSI.No.54/2022).
Case law
Commentary: Whilst we don't yet have any commentary in relation to the case law items below, we'd love to hear from you if you'd like to contribute. Send us a suggestion and we’d be happy to incorporate it here. | Add commentary or suggest an edit.
-
Tick box answers in PIP2 questionnaire cannot be used by First-tier Tribunal as a proxy to obviate the need to make findings about the frequency of a claimant’s difficulties
- [2022] UKUT 316 (AAC)
- UA-2021-000723-PIP
- AW v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP)
-
Application of personal independence payment activities and descriptors to a claimant who is a ‘functioning alcoholic’
- [2021] UKUT 226 (AAC)
- CPIP/2229/2019
- DE v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP)
-
Alcohol dependence and factors to consider when assessing a claimant’s ability to perform PIP functions
- [2017] UKUT 310 (AAC)
- CPIP/3126/2016
- SD v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP)
- Precautionary use of incontinence pads can help satisfy the 50 per cent test in regulation 7
- [2017] UKUT 258 (AAC)
- CPIP/387/2017
- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v NH (PIP)
-
The required period is made of two periods - a retrospective one and prospective one / an advance claim can only succeed if the 50 per cent rule is met for the retrospective period
- [2016] UKUT 541 (AAC)
- CPIP/2504/2016
- AH v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP)
-
Claimant may be able to establish a need for prompting even if able to perform a specific task when there is impetus to do so
- [2016] UKUT 194 (AAC)
- CPIP/181/2016
- GG v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP)
-
Use of microwave to heat ready prepared food is not sufficient / Importance of applying regulations 4 and 7
- [2016] UKUT 150 (AAC)
- CPIP/1418/2015
- LC v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP)
- Claimant can satisfy PIP descriptors if they only apply for part of the day
- [2015] UKUT 626 (AAC)
- Reported as [2016] AACR 23
- CPIP/2054/2015
- TR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
-
Where a claimant suffers from two or more conditions, probability of PIP descriptors applying on more than 50 per cent of days must be calculated
- [2015] UKUT 620 (AAC)
- UK/972/2015
- AK v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Meaning of ‘engage with other people’ in activity 9, and its interaction with regulations 4 and 7
- [2015] UKUT 215 (AAC)
- UK/5205/2014
- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v AM
-
Whether the ‘broad brush approach’ established in Moyna applies to decisions for personal independence payment
- [2015] UKUT 144 (AAC)
- CSPIP/754/2014
- JC v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions